点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
春节留守海外的“90后”小伙宋默奇：“我在这里讲述扬州故事”******
中新网南京1月18日电 (徐珊珊)“我经常用美食来拉进和朋友间的距离。在中餐厅吃饭时，时常会有扬州炒饭，我会向他们介绍，这是我家乡扬州的美食，并告诉他们要怎么制作才能更香，比如要放三次葱花这些小细节，大家都非常感兴趣。”18日，通过视频连线，谈起在海外留学和工作的经历时，28岁的扬州小伙宋默奇如是说。
作为一名留美近十年的华侨小伙，宋默奇对动画制作十分痴迷。他大学就读于中国传媒大学南广学院动画与数字艺术学院，2016年夏季被旧金山艺术大学录取，攻读动画和视觉效果专业，获得创新硕士学位。目前，宋默奇在MPC电影公司任职，负责电影前期和中期制作，先后参与了多部热播电影的中期制作。
宋默奇与大学教授相互切磋围棋技艺。 受访者供图对于大部分人来说，这是一份极具挑战性的工作。宋默奇表示：“在工作中，我们会遇到一些看上去很难的部分，这时就要迎难而上，不要有畏难情绪。”
为了一个一秒的镜头或一个特效动作，宋默奇经常聚精会神地制作到深夜，有时一做就是一个星期甚至更长时间。他说，三维动画的电脑制作学起来并不是很难，但要求学习者或从业人员有耐心、细心和想象力。
随着“国风”逐渐风靡海外，越来越多的电影运用和呈现中华传统文化相关内容。宋默奇介绍，《花木兰》《功夫熊猫》等动画电影都融入了中国的叙事风格，国风音乐、国风场景等都很受欢迎。
国际友人邀请宋默奇一起包饺子。 受访者供图动画电影如何能更好地传播中华传统文化？宋默奇认为，中国历史悠久，有着光辉灿烂的文化，中国的世界非遗项目，比如雕版印刷技艺、书法、剪纸等，这都是可以通过动画电影来表达和展现的珍贵素材，来助推中国文化“走出去”。
在日常生活中，宋默奇经常会遇到喜欢中国文化的国际友人，宋默奇会和他们分享扬州“早上皮包水，下午水包皮”的生活节奏，以及雕版印刷技艺、扬州漆器、扬州玉器、广陵琴派等非遗文化知识。宋默奇表示：“正是这样的慢节奏生活，扬州市曾被评为‘联合国人居奖’。他们听完后非常开心，纷纷表示要去扬州旅游，对此我也是十分自豪。”
如今，回忆起刚到美国留学的时光，宋默奇依旧感慨万分。他告诉记者，自己在适应国外生活的过程中，得到很多华侨华人的帮助，比如来自南京的八十岁华人Shirly，在其租房方面给与了很多照顾。Shirly的房子只租给中国留学生，逢年过节，Shirly会给留学生们送上礼物和美食，“我的手被烫伤了，她会及时送来烫伤膏，我也向她赠送了家乡扬州的漆器”。
工作团队合影。 受访者供图宋默奇已经春节留守海外三年了。癸卯兔年在即，他选择继续留守美国，与家人、朋友“云上”过年、线上团圆，共度新春佳节。
“自己虽饱含思乡之情，但由于工作原因不能回国过年，遗憾之余也想到‘有舍必有得’，希望能与家乡共同进步，用好的作品来回报家人一直以来对我的支持和关心。‘路虽远，行则将至；事虽难，做则必成’。怀着对未来的希望，我们一直在路上。”宋默奇说。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)