大发平台攻略_在线用户注册平台 | 官网APP下载

来源：大发平台登录2021-08-06 17:48

大发平台攻略

用脚步丈量祖国大地，向世界讲好中国故事******

用脚步丈量祖国大地，向世界讲好中国故事

讲述人：中国人民大学新闻学院党委副书记、教授闫岩

　　党的二十大报告明确指出，要“加强全媒体传播体系建设，塑造主流舆论新格局”“加强国际传播能力建设，全面提升国际传播效能，形成同我国综合国力和国际地位相匹配的国际话语权”。这两个“加强”凸显了新闻舆论工作的重要性。作为一名新闻传播学教师，我深感使命光荣，重任在肩。

　　2022年4月25日，习近平总书记在中国人民大学考察调研时指出，“希望广大青年用脚步丈量祖国大地，用眼睛发现中国精神，用耳朵倾听人民呼声，用内心感应时代脉搏，把对祖国血浓于水、与人民同呼吸共命运的情感贯穿学业全过程、融汇在事业追求中”。这对新闻传播学高等教育提出的要求，就是要培养一批真正认识中国、了解中国、热爱中国的新闻人才。

　　中国人民大学新闻学院长期开展的“田野课堂”特色教学项目，正是为实现这个人才培养目标服务的。我们带领学生走进偏远山区和边疆民族地区，走进县级融媒体中心和全球领军的互联网企业，让学生们亲眼见到新时代十年的伟大变革，亲身感受祖国建设的伟大成就和社会主义制度的优越性，从而立志成长为党的政策主张的传播者、时代风云的记录者、社会进步的推动者、公平正义的守望者。

　　我自2021年3月带队启动“中华人民共和国脱贫攻坚口述史”项目，迄今已带领本院师生1000余人次走过5省19市65个前国家级贫困县（市、区）访谈各地县（市、区）级主要领导、脱贫攻坚和乡村振兴工作干部、驻村第一书记、脱贫户代表等逾800人。从大别山麓到滇缅边境，从乌江画廊到湘江水畔，学生们扛着摄影机、背着摄像机、架着无人机，记录下祖国的山乡巨变、民众的笑声与呼声。

　　去年10月以来，新闻学院党委带领全体师生不断深入学习党的二十大精神，开设“中国式现代化大讲堂”、举办新闻传播拔尖创新人才培养高端论坛、组织主题党日活动、开展联合学习等，积极推进党的二十大精神进教材、进课堂、进头脑，用党的创新理论培根铸魂、启智润心。在这些活动中我们发现，参加过“田野课堂”的学生，明显对中国式现代化的理论内涵与实践要求更有共鸣。田野实践使同学们更坚实地增强“四个自信”，更自觉地践行“两个维护”；使他们更能坚定立场、明辨是非，不为各种矮化曲解、挑拨离间、混淆视听的言论所迷惑；使他们能够基于自己的亲身经验向世界讲述有血有肉的中国故事，基于自己的专业技能向全球传递可信可敬的中国声音。

　　几十年来，中国人民大学新闻学院为党和国家培养了无数卓越新闻传播人才。作为新时代新闻传播学一线教师，我们将以实际行动贯彻党的二十大精神，聚焦全媒体传播体系建设和国际传播能力建设，为党和国家培养更多更优秀的新闻传播人才。

　　《光明日报》（ 2023年01月10日 05版）

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.